The Court said that the candidate would be required to approach the competent court for authorization as it were in case of a orchestrate to go abroad. The Allahabad tall Court as of late held that individuals with pending criminal cases against them do not require to see for prior authorization of the courts for issuance of worldwide id [Umapati v. Union of India]. A Seat of Equity Alok Mathur and Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal said that the competent pro is underneath a arrange to take a choice underneath Zone 5 of the Distinguishing pieces of proof Act on an application for issuance of passport. “If he is of the conclusion that it is a fit case for donate of a worldwide id, he may pass an reasonable orchestrate for issuance of the visa and in case he feels that conditions exists for refusal for provide of the universal id he may pass an reasonable orchestrate considering grounds of Portion 6 of Indian Worldwide id Act,” the Court said. It included that there exists no course of action requiring a person standing up to criminal cases to see for prior authorization from a court for issuance of passport. “This Court is of the considered see that no earlier consent from the competent court is required where the criminal cases are pending for issue of widespread id underneath the Indian Visa Act and no such course of action has been conceived in the said Act." The Court was hearing a ask moved by one Umapati in whose case the universal id master had declined to take any choice on issuance of visa due to the pendency of two criminal cases against him. In response to Umapati’s request looking for a choice on the pending visa application, Appoint Master Common SB Pandey fought that the visa pro was not obliged to take any choice and the specialist should to apply to the court where the criminal cases are pending. However, the Court said that the specialist would be required to approach the competent court for assent as it were in case of a organize to go abroad. While expelling the dissent raised by the Central government direct, the Court said, “Once an application is made for allow of a widespread id at that point the ace has to take a choice in terms of statutory courses of activity underneath the Indian Visa Act and fittingly a case for hindrances is made out.” Accordingly, the Court facilitated the universal id master to consider and select the petitioner's application for visa in understanding with law.