This landmark step for gender equality in the legal profession was in the form of an interim order responding to a plea that pointed to the underrepresentation of women in leadership positions in the country's bar bodies.Background of the Case The issue was brought to the forefront when a Public Interest Litigation was filed for inclusion of women in decision-making roles within bar associations. It was argued that the absence of females at the decision-making table was not only unbalanced but also adversely affecting professional growth among women advocates. More and more women are joining the profession, but their presence in the administration is negligible. This the petitioner urged the court should correct by introducing a reservation policy. Supreme Court's Interim Order The bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul accepted the legitimacy of the concerns raised in the petition. While delivering the order, the court emphasized that the legal profession must reflect the principles of equality enshrined in the Constitution of India. The bench noted that a reservation policy could be a critical step in dismantling systemic barriers faced by women in the field. The court has directed the initiation of 30% reservation for women in the executive committees of bar associations in Delhi, which include the high-profile bodies like Delhi High Court Bar Association and several district court bar associations. This is going to be in the nature of a pilot to assess its feasibility and effectiveness. Important Points Raised The court made some relevant observations during the arguments. Professional Diversity: The court determined that greater representation of female members would enrich the decisions with diversity and inclusivity. Encouragement towards Women Advocates: This would encourage more women to work actively in the leadership processes, by requiring seats in bar councils. Implementation on Trial Basis: This short term time frame of the reservation would allow the process to become effective before it is executed in full form. Future Plans and Consequences This has been deemed as a progressive step of equality in the legal field among men and women. But the court made this clear that this is just an experimental measure, and its long-term success relies on its outcome. The court directed the updating of constitutions of the respective bar associations and submitted compliance reports within a stipulated period. This decision had the nation discussing the similar initiatives needed in the nation to have an inclusive, balanced legal system.